<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Git Peepcode Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rubygeek.com/2008/05/14/git-peepcode-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rubygeek.com/2008/05/14/git-peepcode-review/</link>
	<description>Ruby, PHP, Python and Perl</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Getting Git - Push cx</title>
		<link>http://www.rubygeek.com/2008/05/14/git-peepcode-review/#comment-19935</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting Git - Push cx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rubygeek.com/?p=116#comment-19935</guid>
		<description>[...] switched to reading Git Internals on a friend&#8217;s recommendation. Some minor formatting oddities aside (widows, orphans, and why not put the graphs in the gigantic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] switched to reading Git Internals on a friend&#8217;s recommendation. Some minor formatting oddities aside (widows, orphans, and why not put the graphs in the gigantic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
